Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Feb 7, 2007 16:14
17 yrs ago
Chinese term
对数值
Chinese to English
Other
Mathematics & Statistics
卫生部门分析说，主要是有效氯含量和杀灭（细菌）对数值不足
Thanks.
Thanks.
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 +2 | Log value |
Lu Zou
|
| 5 +1 | FYI |
Angeline PhD
|
| 3 +2 | logarithmic value |
Shaunna (X)
|
| 3 | corresponding value (指 dependent variable) |
chica nueva
|
Proposed translations
+2
7 hrs
Selected
Log value
杀灭（细菌）对数值= 杀灭对数值（Killing log value)
其实讲的是对数级别，即有多少个零，参阅以下网页中第二个表格
http://www.thebody.com/pinf/diagnostic/diagnostic3.html
其实讲的是对数级别，即有多少个零，参阅以下网页中第二个表格
http://www.thebody.com/pinf/diagnostic/diagnostic3.html
Reference:
http://www.labyes.net/lab/ksgl/2006-12-10/-_0.htm
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=243921
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks."
+2
9 mins
logarithmic value
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
billychang
59 mins
|
|
Thank you billychange.
|
|
| agree |
franksf
1 hr
|
|
Yes. I find it hard to fit too.
|
4 hrs
chica nueva
Native in English
http://youtube/iraVWQu3Zf8
Native in: English (Variants: British, New Zealand)
Works in: Chinese to English
Related KudoZ points
:
4
corresponding value (指 dependent variable)
究其不合格原因，卫生部门分析说，主要是有效氯含量和杀灭（细菌）对数值不足。这两项指标不合格意味着消毒剂杀灭细菌能力不足。
something like 'dependent variable' or '对照数值' its corresponding value
有效氯含量与其对数值(即细菌)二者都不足
not sure whether I have translated it correctly, see what the technical people say...
something like 'dependent variable' or '对照数值' its corresponding value
有效氯含量与其对数值(即细菌)二者都不足
not sure whether I have translated it correctly, see what the technical people say...
+1
14 hrs
Angeline PhD
China
China
Native in Chinese
Works in field
China
Associate Professor +14 Years Experience
Native in: Chinese
Works in: English to Chinese, Chinese to English
FYI
杀灭对数值: killing log value
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
chica nueva
: This is it - excellent! Plenty of bilingual Google refs to 'killing log value (KL). Couldn't verify the exact term from the English monolingual sources, but this should be close to the correct technical (microbiological) term.
22 hrs
|
|
Thanks Lesley!
|
Discussion