Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

coverage

English answer:

coverage; cover

Added to glossary by Charlesp
Feb 13, 2013 05:14
11 yrs ago
20 viewers *
English term

coverage

English Other Insurance plural of coverage
Hello

Can somebody can help me to find the plural of coverage? My spelling tool keeps telling me that "coverages" is incorrect. The text I am working on is about insurance and kind of coverage.

Thank you

Best Regards
Responses
5 +3 coverage
Change log

Mar 6, 2013 13:50: Charlesp Created KOG entry

Discussion

Charlesp Feb 14, 2013:
VERY INTERESTING DISCUSSION It is amazing how such an interesting conversation developed out of a simple question.
Very useful input by all. And even the "disagreements" are a learning tool.
Charlesp Feb 13, 2013:
moneys is a real word, it is the plural of money It can also be spelled monies.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_'monies'_a_real_word
ViBe Feb 13, 2013:
Fully concur with David (on both counts), but... ... does it solve our Asker's dilemma?
David Moore (X) Feb 13, 2013:
Welocme to ProZ... and please say why you would not use "cover"? To me, "coverage" is a slightly bombastic version of cover...
Charlesp Feb 13, 2013:
I absoutely agree with ViBe but in fact in fact "coverages" is used in the UK.
(AND it's not clear what the asker is asking)
ViBe Feb 13, 2013:
That (what Charlesp is suggesting) or... ... I'd consider playing with "(various) coverage options/scenarios" or adding some other countable noun. "Benefits" (payable to the insured person) may also work in some contexts. It all depends on the specific context, really!

Responses

+3
2 hrs
Selected

coverage

Some words in English are the same for the plural as they are for the singular.

One wouldn't say "moneyies" for a lot of money. (Though of course moneys does exist, but that is something else, and never used.)

Coverage is plural. As in a "range of coverage"

BUT on the other hand, "we offer various coverages" could be said, but that would first of all be UK English and secondly mean something quite different.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2013-02-13 07:22:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

P.S. It is simply that your spelling tool is incorrect.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2013-02-13 07:23:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

http://www.salsburyins.com/10.html
Peer comment(s):

agree British Diana : Plural is simply kinds of coverage, like types of advice, information etc.
1 hr
yes British Diana - quite well said.
agree ViBe : sure: kindS of...
1 hr
hey!
neutral B D Finch : I think we need more context to be sure that "coverages" is incorrect here. You are wrong about "moneys", the plural of "money" is "monies" and is widely used in contractual/legal contexts.//Yes.
2 hrs
Really? Are you sure?
neutral David Moore (X) : I also challenge the assertion that "coverage" is "in common use" in the UK - my one-time insurance agency tells me the term "cover" is far more common in this context, i.e. of different types of insurance "cover". //I am not saying it isn't used at all
6 hrs
It is a word in general usage in the insurance industry in the UK, so no, I don't think that it cannot be pluralised. Any word that is in general usage should be in the database of a spelling tool. Highlighting the term in the grammar tool is another th
agree Tony M : I agree that it is very likely 'coverage' is the wrong word anway; this happens a lot with FR>EN, where 'couverture' is sometimes 'coverage', but also 'cover'. More context essential in order to be sure.
26 days
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."

Reference comments

5 hrs
Reference:

For those who doubt the use of "coverages"

www.columbusdirect.com/usa/travel-insurance-coverage.cfm
"Information about coverages | Columbus Direct Travel Insurance.
... What other coverages are typically included in a Travel Guard travel insurance plan?"

http://www.actuaries.org.uk/research-and-resources/documents... premium-rating-personal-lines-coverages-united-states
"Premium rating for personal lines coverages in the United States
Author: David J Grady
Source: General Insurance Convention 1982
Publication date: 30 September 1982 "
Peer comments on this reference comment:

neutral David Moore (X) : I know languages develop, but I don't think coverage*s* exist - except with some sloppy, lazy, insurance-jargon speakers.
41 mins
My previous response has disappeared; jargon serves a useful purpose within linguistic communities: it often clarifies and gives greater precision, filling gaps in what is generally, linguistically available.
agree Samantha Payn : Coverages is definitely used in the insurance market. Whether it is lazy or not, it is certainly acceptable as jargon.
9 hrs
Thanks Samantha. A proofreader once messed up a contract translation I did by changing "has insurances in place" to "has insurance": potentially damaging the Client's interest vis-à-vis the Contractor.
agree Tony M : Yes, it's perfectly acceptable as a plural in the jargon sense, but non in the everday sense of 'the act of covering', which is uncountable.
26 days
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search