Poll: Would you say competition in your pair(s) or area(s) of expertise has increased in the past 2 years? Лице кое објавува дискусија: ProZ.com Staff
|
|---|
This forum topic is for the discussion of the poll question "Would you say competition in your pair(s) or area(s) of expertise has increased in the past 2 years?".
View the poll results »
| | | | neilmac
Шпанија
Local time: 04:46
шпански на англиски
+ ...
There was already a lot of competition in my ES-EN pair, with many people translating into their L2. The increasing widespread availability of MT and grammar checking software like Grammarly mean that almost anyone with half a brain and a modicum of target language knowledge can have a bash at translating. I believe the situation is worse in the Americas than in Europe, for economic reasons.
| | | | mroed (X)
Local time: 04:46
италијански на германски
+ ...
in my field (legal on a high level) there are not too many "real" competitors. Sometimes clients stay away for a while, but finally come back.
But as I already wrote in another posting: The assignments coming in are getting more challenging.
| | | | Thayenga 
Германија
Local time: 04:46
Член (2009)
англиски на германски
+ ...
Yes in my primary language pair EN GE. No in the area of expertise.
| | |
|
|
|
| I don't know | Oct 24, 2019 |
but there is still enough work to go around as far as I am concerned.
| | | | | Good point, NeilMac | Oct 25, 2019 |
Yes, with the tools available clients can produce translations good enough to get by in many cases. It depends on how much quality they want, or need.
To get a point across, if a primitive way will suffice, we are increasingly expendable.
Thus, the human translator's role is to produce translations that are not just decent (which technology can almost do now, with the exception of the occasional blunder) but rather linguistically perfect, and even elegant, translation... See more Yes, with the tools available clients can produce translations good enough to get by in many cases. It depends on how much quality they want, or need.
To get a point across, if a primitive way will suffice, we are increasingly expendable.
Thus, the human translator's role is to produce translations that are not just decent (which technology can almost do now, with the exception of the occasional blunder) but rather linguistically perfect, and even elegant, translations, thereby delivering an added value that only a trained professional can.
Perhaps there is a silver lining to this trend, which strikes fear into the hearts of many translators: we are becoming writers, to a greater extent. Clients are going to want style, because an MT can give them the general idea.
neilmac wrote:
There was already a lot of competition in my ES-EN pair, with many people translating into their L2. The increasing widespread availability of MT and grammar checking software like Grammarly mean that almost anyone with half a brain and a modicum of target language knowledge can have a bash at translating. I believe the situation is worse in the Americas than in Europe, for economic reasons.
[Edited at 2019-10-25 09:21 GMT] ▲ Collapse
| | | | Alexandra Hirsch (X)
Австрија
Local time: 04:46
англиски на германски
+ ...
@NeilMac
You paint a very bleak picture when you say that using MT and a grammar checker are the tools of the future!
Shall I show you my collection of beautiful blunders? (Calm down, folks. It's not what you're thinking…) Apart from those in user manuals where you end up turning the wrong knob or opening the wrong panel or whatever, lots occur in literary translation:
a) a black plastic bin liner becomes a body bag (!);
b) a rocket built at site X ... See more @NeilMac
You paint a very bleak picture when you say that using MT and a grammar checker are the tools of the future!
Shall I show you my collection of beautiful blunders? (Calm down, folks. It's not what you're thinking…) Apart from those in user manuals where you end up turning the wrong knob or opening the wrong panel or whatever, lots occur in literary translation:
a) a black plastic bin liner becomes a body bag (!);
b) a rocket built at site X is actually launched (!) from site X;
c) a biker gang sets out to protect the person they are actually aiming to kill (!);
d) a walking stick with an eagle head becomes an eagle head;
e) a group of people becomes one person;
f) someone's eyes wonder rather than wander (due to a spelling error in the source text);
…
Not what you would call 'equivalent', are they? But how would you recognise the errors if you didn't speak the language or had no access to the source text? (I'm stating the obvious. Sorry.)
Source text handed to MT tools have to be uncorrupted, correct and conventional, otherwise the machine spits out garbage. So, pre- and post-editing are quite unavoidable. Plenty of work there. ▲ Collapse
| | | | Mario Freitas
Бразил
Local time: 23:46
англиски на португалски
+ ...
It has certainly increased in number. But in terms of quality, it's decreasing fast.
| | | | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » Poll: Would you say competition in your pair(s) or area(s) of expertise has increased in the past 2 years? | Draftsmith | Edit Translations Faster With Affordable AI You Can Trust
Draftsmith is an affordable AI editing tool for busy translators. It works directly in Microsoft Word, supporting the way you work
ProZ members receive a 20% discount on a single user subscription of Draftsmith.
More info » |
| | Pastey | Your smart companion app
Pastey is an innovative desktop application that bridges the gap between human expertise and artificial intelligence. With intuitive keyboard shortcuts, Pastey transforms your source text into AI-powered draft translations.
Find out more » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
